'Clee Hill' oil on canvas, 137 x 152cms, 2009
I
visited ‘Views’, a retrospective of the work of Boyd and Evans at Ikon Gallery,
Birmingham the other day. There was a lot to enjoy in the paintings of these
artists, who are also partners, who work together to creation their work. The
earlier work made in the 1970’s, and airbrushed on in acrylic paint, explored
an interest in surrealist ideas associated with collage and piecing seemingly
disparate images or elements to create slightly disturbing and dreamlike
juxtapositions. Narrative was also seemingly explored with many of the
paintings existing as diptych’s, with the second image often looking like the
next scene in some sort of movie, partly helped by the photographic ‘look’ of
the paintings. I couldn’t help feeling rather disappointed and deflated however,
when in an interview that accompanied the work in the gallery pamphlet, the
artist’s proclaimed that if photoshop had been invented when they originally
made the work, they would have not been paintings. They would have looked awful
as photoshopped images. Weirdly, most of the paintings had a 1970’s prog rock
record sleeve feel about them.
'Underpass', acrylic on canvas, 91 x137cms, 1983
The
later work was less personal in nature, and was inspired by trips the artist’s
had made with the support of the British Council to some of the more remote areas
of the United States and the spectacular nature to be found there. These
landscapes were punctuated by human activity in the form of desolate towns, abandoned
vehicles, trailers, the odd person, and areas of UFO sightings. I enjoyed these
more, and made me reflect on my own forthcoming trip to Scandinavia, where I
too will be exploring unfamiliar terrain as a visitor, an ‘outsider’, whereas
most of my current landscape work has been located in more personal settings
and my ‘own back yard’. The Boyd and Evans work did often look like paintings
that owed too much to their photographic source material for my own tastes.
They had a dispassionate quality, and lacked a certain charge despite (or
because of) the psychology being layed on a bit thick, that I hope to avoid,
despite often taking a seemingly dispassionate view myself in my approach to my
subject matter. There were some very sophisticated images, but they weren’t
very exciting paintings. The photographs that were also now being presented
worked more successfully.
'Ash Springs', Archival Pigment Transfer Print, 110 x 199cms, 2007
I left
the exhibition not entirely convinced, but a little unsure as to why. At one
point the work seemed a lot about the relationship between painting and
photography, but then not so much in the later work. The work was painted in a
very mundane way with a deliberate lack of style, but really I wished it had a
bit more well, style. There was a lot
made about the collaboration between the two artists, and the idea of two
viewpoints in the work, who made what etc, but I didn’t care much for this and
thought the work possessed a single unified vision if anything. I bought the
catalogue hoping to find more in the concepts behind the work, but didn’t
really. As with a lot of contemporary art that is held up as good practice, I
was left wanting more…It might be worth stating that I did experience this
exhibition with my lively little four-year old in tow. It might be worth a
second visit on my own…